On March 6, 2019, Christoffer Stanford Thygesen, the father of the child, and son of multi-millionaire Allan Thygesen
SF Judge gave Allan Thygesen the CEO of DocuSign's & A.P. Moller Maersk's son, full custody and move-away to Denmark ex-parte.
taken to 
February of 2018
Allan Thygesen has a son, Christoffer Thygesen. Christoffer Thygesen met Kailin Wang through a dating app “Tinder” in February of 2018.
2/14/18
TINDER: On February 14, 2018; Ms. Wang traveled to San Francisco on a vacation. Christoffer Thygesen, and Kailin Wang connected on “Tinder.” Wang at all times lived in Utah. Text Messages between Christoffer Thygesen
On February 28, 2018, the parties met in person for the first time at a bar in Pacific Heights called Snug. When Kailin met Christoffer, he told her he was high on drugs and often texted strangers online to go to have casual sex at his house that Christoffer lives with two roommates in San Francisco. Christoffer made it a point to tell Kailin, he has slept with “a ton of Asian girls.” Christoffer told Kailin to call him “Tiggy”, Christoffer boasted about frequently participating in “Netflix and chill” sessions, an Internet slang term used as a euphemism for sexual activity, told Kailin about his recent trips to Shanghai, China, Christoffer went for International Hearthstone video game competitions.
From March 4, 2018, to June 20, 2018, Christoffer sent several unsolicited photos of his genitals, pictures of him posing in front of a mirror with an erect penis, and Snapchat videos of him masturbating alone from his account #Tegroplease to Kailin.
On June 16, 2018, Christoffer texted, “ I’ll make it worth your while, at least 5-Stars”, insinuating he will take me to a five-star restaurant in exchange for sex.
6/20/18
PREGNANT: Wang finds out she is pregnant Thygesen desperately pressures her into an abortion, threatening a bad ending of she did not abort the child.
6/24/18
“THREAT OF A BAD ENDING I DID NOT ABORT THE BABY:” Mr. Thygesen warned Ms. Wang that her decision to keep the child would not be without severe consequences. On June 24, 2018, Christopher Thygesen in retaliation threatened Wang, sent the following message to Ms. Wang:
“The longer you wait the harder it’s going to be to pull the trigger. I don’t know what you’ve been researching or who’s been giving you advice but this will not play out favorably for anyone. Guaranteed. I can’t sugar-coat this since it’s so late already.” — — — — — — — — -June 24, 2018, Text messages sent to Ms. Wang by Christoffer Thygesen.
Ms. Wang did not heed Mr. Thygesen’s warning and ultimately gave birth to their child in Utah November of 2018. Mr. Thygesen, after the birth of his child, did not attempt to see the child, pay child support or assume any responsibility for his newborn son. Ms. Wang, having been blocked by Mr. Thygesen, from contacting him, reached out to his parents, who also eventually blocked her. The Thygesen family, using its wealth and power, manipulated multiple court systems to their own ends: denying Wang access to or custody of her child, — — — forever.
11/2018 BIRTH: Baby is born in Utah, Christoffer knew of the date of birth, and failed to appear to be present at birth. In fact Christoffer Thygesen, does not even call or text, nor communicate in any way whatsoever to inquire about the birth, health, etc. of his newborn son. In fact the only action taken by Thygesen during this time was to quit his job as a Data Scientist @ Square in efforts to dilute his income to avoid paying any child support. (Exhibit: 02/26/19 Email from Square Inc. Christoffer’s former employer, Christoffer quit his job one month before birth of his son)
12/6/18
GOOGLE ALLAN THYGESEN: On 12/6/19 Wang via email sends pictures of the baby to Allan Thygesen and Terry Thygesen, when Wang states adoption and termination of parental rights were NOT options for her, they all blocked her. 2018–12–05 Email to Allan Thygesen and Terry Parents Re_ Christoffer has a Baby.pdf
Early on — — to amicably resolve issues of custody and support — attempts were made to inquire about Thygesen’s intentions with the child through emails to his parents and counsel Darrick Chase on December 5, 2018. February 3, 2019, and on February 11, 2019. However, when I stated adoption and termination of parental rights weren’t options for me, I was blocked from further communication from all members of the
Thygesen family and was reported to the San Francisco Police Department since child Support services determined Thygesen was the father and owed outstanding child support to Wang. Note when Wang sent pictures of the Baby to Allan and Terry Thygesen, they were so disgusted Christoffer fathered an ethic baby that they reported this email informing them that they were now grandparents as an act of stalking and extortion
2/11/19
GENETIC TEST RESULTS: Court-Ordered Genetic DNA testing confirms Christoffer Thygesen as the father. See Email of Genetic DNA test results informing the Thygesen’s of the Genetic DNA test results.
2/13/19
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE (SGT. MICHELE MARTINEZ #1208): Allan Thygesen, makes a police report with the SFPD concerning alleging Wang is Cyber Stalking the family and posting blogs that “Christoffer Thygesen is a Sperm Bank.” While this alleged conduct that ceased in February 2019 was officially charged on October 18, 2019 the day of the parties big Child Custody Hearing.
2/15/19
DV-100, DV-105, DV-108 FILED BY THYGESEN: On February 15, 2019, with no warning, Thygesen filed a Request for a Restraining Order w/ Custody. (2/15/19 DVRO w/ Custody) Unbeknownst to her, he sneakily appended a request for sole legal and physical custody of our child and requested that Wang receive “no visitation at all.” The custody request was denied pending a hearing on March 6, 2019.
ON 3/6/19, THYGESEN STAGED A FAKE DEATH THREAT POST IMPERSONATING WANG: On March 6, 2019, a murder/suicide post appeared on Holysmoke.org. Thygesen impersonated Wang by using identity-concealing technologies (VPN). The child was literally ripped screaming from the arms of his terrified grandmother in her Utah home. The Thygesen family, through that suspect, conveniently-timed post, believed they would be able to permanently remove Ms. Wang from her son’s life.
EMERGENCY CUSTODY ORDERS ARE GRANTED: Because of that fake post, at an Ex Parte Hearing Thygesen is granted Sole Legal/Physical custody of his 3.5 months son, whom he has never met before, never provided for, with [“No Visitation At All”] against Wang.
5/8/19: JUDGE DARWIN SETS CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION EVIDENTIARY HEARING: Judge Darwin set UCCJEA Hearing on whether California or Utah has jurisdiction to make Child Custody and Visitation Orders Hearing set for June 25, 2019. Thygesen refuses to allow Wang to see her 4 months old son, the one he obtained via ex-parte orders entered on March 6, 2019
6/10/19: ILLEGAL APPLICATION FOR A MINOR’S PASSPORT TO ABSCOND W/ CHILD BEFORE PERMANENT CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION HEARING: Thygesen Attempted to Kidnap Child by Illegally applying for a Passport.
On June 10, 2019, fifteen days [before] our jurisdiction UCCJEA hearing, Thygesen changed the child’s name and attempted to abduct Baby K Wang out of the country and illegally applied for an international passport, in violation of [Family Code 3063], and ATRO, automatic RO’s restricting any party while a domestic proceeding is pending from applying for passports, restricts any and all travel with child to the parent receiving custody outside the State of California, and must obtain permission by a noticed hearing, and court order.
6/25/19
UTAH HAS JURISDICTION TO MAKE CHILD CUSTODY ORDERS: At the 6/25/19 Evidentiary Hearing, Wang was heard for the first time before Judge Darwin, who reversed his initial 3/6/19 decision and rules Utah is the Home State under UCCJEA and orders Custody/Visitation.
A critical child custody jurisdiction hearing in Utah is set on October 18, 2019. This hearing would be life changing (due to the 30–3–35.5. Utah Mandatory Minimum Parent-Time Laws) which would be imminent for Wang to have a relationship with her son, — — - the Thygesens’ would do everything within their power to prevent Wang from seeing her son. See also Utah Code, Section 30-3-34.5. Section 30-3-34.5 was passed specifically address the problem of Courts being a little too free in ordering supervised parent-time. On top of this, courts must find “evidence that the child would be subject to physical or emotional harm or child abuse . . . from the noncustodial parent if left unsupervised with the noncustodial parent,” unlike in California.
10/17/19
THYGESEN HAS WANG ARRESTED: Thygesen has Wang arrested on $750,000 Bond right before her visitation @ Rally at Saint Francis Memorial Hospital on 10/17/19, the day before the big Utah Child Custody Jurisdiction Hearing. Donald A. Dubain is prosecutor.
WANG IN JAIL/ MISSED UTAH CUSTODY HEARING/THYGESEN WINS MOTION TO DISMISS UTAH’S JURISDICTION TO MAKE NEW CHILD CUSTODY ORDERS (AS ORDERED TO DO SO BY SF JUDGE DARWIN per FOAH 7/18/19) : Utah declines child custody jurisdiction, Wang loses everything, Thygesen wins his Motion to Dismiss.
In the past 5 years Wang has completed over 200+ Professional Supervised Visits where Wang and her parents drive, or fly from Utah to California for 1 to 2-hour Rally (Supervised Visits).
Wang has never missed a single interstate supervised visit in 5 years.
For every visit Wang has to drive with her parents 2,000 miles per trip from Utah to California to see her now 5-year-old son, which Thygesen has still repeatedly, and vexatiously requested to Terminate even what limited time Wang has with her only child.
Wang has Rally Visits first two weeks of the month where Wang and her parents have to make very early arrangements whether by driving the 15 hour trip with her parents (who raised the child with Wang in their Utah home from Birth until forced removal by Utah DCFS on 3/7/19 (findings reversed on 11/8/19) pursuant to this courts 3/6/19 ex-parte order) driving each way through treacherous Sierra Nevada mountainous roads from Utah to California or flying with both her parents as Wang is always in fear for her life as Thygesen has armed agents surveil Wang at Rally visits, and or will plan another false arrest like he did by having Wang arrested at $750,000 bond on October 17, 2019, less than 24 hours before the parties October 18, 2019 Utah UCCJEA hearing, where Wang lost as a result of Thygesen’s timely arrest of her in San Francisco at Rally and as a result which in turn lost the only chance she could have had for any meaningful relationship with her son
https://www.davisvanguard.org/2023/11/records-reveal-suspicious-timing-surrounding-divorce-attorney-death/
Opinion for Thygesen v. Wang CA1/4 - Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high…www.courtlistener.com
Opinion for C.T. v. K.W. - Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open…www.courtlistener.com
Opinion for C.T. v. K.W. - Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open…www.courtlistener.com
Comments